Subject:
|
Re: part numbers screwed up?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Jun 1999 23:46:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
619 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote:
> A bunch of good stuff about moved parts that I snipped. <
> Terry warned us about this.
Thanks. I guess I wasn't pay enough attention.
--
Patrick Sayre-Little | "hE's gOnE mAd, mAd I tEll yOU!!"
wsayreli@calpoly.edu | -me ...I think
http://www.calpoly.edu/~wsayreli |
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: part numbers screwed up?
|
| (...) Once again, I feel compelled to apologize profusely about this. I really hated to do it, but had no choice. The way the pieces were numbered was wrong, and we might as well 'bite the bullet' now and fix it. Sorry about the confusion, -- Terry (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: part numbers screwed up?
|
| (...) I took a look at the part files, and it appears (check the comment files in the 9903 update to be 100% sure) the following moves occured: 3942 (Cone 4 x 4 x 2) was moved to 3943. 3939 (Cone 2 x 2 x 2) was moved to 3942. 3951 was moved to 3939, (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
