 | | Re: Lossless outlining (Was: [ldraw.org] Progress) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) I thought about that, but I was concerned about the burden of differentiating between comments and random extensions to LDraw (ie, new meta-commands). Maybe LDAO should provide/maintain a list of known meta-commands? Then the Inliner could (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Lossless outlining (Was: [ldraw.org] Progress) —Terry Keller
|
| | | | (...) That is an interesting idea. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 7-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lossless outlining (Was: [ldraw.org] Progress) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Hmmm. I wonder where the emphasis goes in that sentence.... Steve (25 years ago, 8-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lossless outlining (Was: [ldraw.org] Progress) —Terry Keller
|
| | | | (...) Oh, right. Sorry. THAT IS AN INTERESTING IDEA. (1) :-) -- Terry K -- 1. Do I tend to over-emphasise things? (25 years ago, 8-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
