Subject:
|
tris vs quads?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 May 2005 05:22:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1900 times
|
| |
|
|
I seem to recall this being discussed here before, but I can't find it.
My question is, if I have a surface covered with a large number of triangles (eg
output from txt2dat), is it better to leave it as triangles, or attempt to
consolidate as many pairs as possible into quads?
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: tris vs quads?
|
| (...) It probably doesn't matter. Either way, the rendered image should look the same. Speedwise, most renderers won't care. In fact, I believe that some programs will split the quads back into triangles in order to render them. In terms of file (...) (20 years ago, 2-May-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
