 | | Re: Anatomy of a POV file (e.g. L3P suggestions) —Lars C. Hassing
| | | | (...) For newbies I think it's nice that the POV file is self-contained and ready-to-render. However, using certain coming options you can exclude camera and lights. Why would you like submodels in separate .inc files ? Only to have a smaller (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Anatomy of a POV file (e.g. L3P suggestions) —Tore Eriksson
| | | | | | (...) I am anything but an expert on this area, but will not the parts, 3001_dot_dat and so on, also be defined multiple times? (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Anatomy of a POV file (e.g. L3P suggestions) —Kevin L. Clague
| | | | | (...) Hi Lars, I'd prefer that the format is unchanged. Right now LPub post-proceses the one file, greying parts as needed, adjusting camera settings for orthographic, and creating new colors for the greyed pieces.... I'd really rather *not* have to (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | |
