|
|
 | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| Steve Bliss wrote... (...) I think this is a possible, but rare case. It can, however, be circumvented by regarding DAT files from PARTS as special. (...) Why not? Any information you can gather by simply analysing a DAT file should not be required (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: General Comments to MLCad
|
| (...) Ahh, "tagged" information then, in other words? :) Cool....... --Todd (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: The updated PARTS.LST online?
|
| (...) Try (URL). It's not searchable (yet), but it is browseable. Steve (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: General Comments to MLCad
|
| (...) It would be better (IMO) to format non-LDraw information as LDraw-style meta-commands, and keep everything in the DAT format. That gives the file the widest transportability between programs. Steve (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: The updated PARTS.LST online?
|
| (...) It is? Well, duh. Thanks for the info. Anyway, I still think that a browsable parts.lst could be a good idea. Sometimes I have the need to look up a part name or number when I'm not on a system with LDraw on it, and I think perhaps others may (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
