|
|
 | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands
|
| (...) ... and no. IMO, if the meta statement isn't listed in the current file format document, it's open to change. The meta-commands on that document (pulling from memory): STEP, PRINT, WRITE, SAVE (?!), (I gave up, dug out the code) PAUSE, CLEAR, (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands
|
| (...) can snag a copy of that. Steve (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: A call to membership!
|
| [XPFUT lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw] (...) I'm interested and willing. Count me in. Although I may be a dissenting voice on a number of organizational issues. Steve (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
|
| (...) Right. But newer OS's and video cards are becoming less compatible with DOS programs, especially DOS programs that do graphics. I used to be able to run LDraw with Super-VGA resolutions (with Win95, I think). I haven't been able to that in (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Latest BFC Spec?
|
| (...) Hmm. To tell you the truth, I don't remember. My main use for it is to make sure patterns are rendered on the backside of transparent solids. I will *allow* that NOCLIP/CLIP can be used to allow non-compliant sections of code, but I don't feel (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
