To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitivesOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / Primitives / 420
419  |  421
Subject: 
Re: Suggested New Primitive: 4-4cyl12.dat (was: More cylinder primitives wanted)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives
Date: 
Mon, 15 May 2006 19:21:18 GMT
Viewed: 
4717 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Tore Eriksson wrote:
If more folks like this idea, how should we name the new primitives?

How about N-4cyla.dat, N-4cylb.dat, etc?

Although I have to admit -- I'm not a huge fan of saving a few lines of code
here and there.  When two such primitives are adjacent, I always have to
double-check which one includes the edge(s).

There is no rule against primitive files calling to other \P files. I didn't
have to look very long to find one. And if we inlined them, I suspect the
primitive substitution in L3P will not work until L3P is updated to support the
new ones. Correct me if I'm wrong.

You are absolutely correct, on both points.

Here's the one I would like to see the most:
0 Cylinder 1.0  with 1 Disc and  2 Edges

I'd most like to see the cylinder with 2 edges.  It's easy enough to add discs
or ndis's on the ends, as required.  But I almost always require the
edge-circles.

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Suggested New Primitive: 4-4cyl12.dat (was: More cylinder primitives wanted)
 
(...) I thought of that, but liked the idea of more descriptive names, like the rect*.dat series. The '1' would in this case stand for number of discs, and '2' for number of edges. But I could definifly live with cyla, cylb etc too. (...) Same here. (...) (19 years ago, 15-May-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)

Message is in Reply To:
  Suggested New Primitive: 4-4cyl12.dat (was: More cylinder primitives wanted)  [DAT]
 
(...) There is no rule against primitive files calling to other \P files. I didn't have to look very long to find one. And if we inlined them, I suspect the primitive substitution in L3P will not work until L3P is updated to support the new ones. (...) (19 years ago, 14-May-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)

10 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR