 | | Re: New Primative 4-4ring1.dat (required for 972pa4.dat)
|
|
(...) Actually, that's the old naming convention. Which is probably the reason George didn't notice the ring1.dat file. :) Steve (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: New Primative 4-4ring1.dat (required for 972pa4.dat) [DAT]
|
|
I missed it. QUAD2DAT still uses the old convention. Steve I already submitted the part to the tracker. Do you want me to resubmit an updated version of the part with the corrected reference to ring1.dat? Or do you have to replace it for me? You (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: New Primative 4-4ring1.dat (required for 972pa4.dat)
|
|
(...) Yes, please submit an updated version of your file. I'll delete the p\4-4ring1.dat. Steve (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: New Primative 4-4ring1.dat (required for 972pa4.dat)
|
|
(...) So what's the stance on old vs. new naming convention for the ring primitives? (I realize there has already been some discussion on this, re: (URL) , most likely other places too) Are we to support the legacy ringX.dat for the full rings that (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
