 | | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) Not sure where you're going with that. I think adding RGB colors to official parts would not be a net improvement to the parts library system. It has nothing to do with backwards compatibility or conservatism. Steve (15 years ago, 10-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts —Willy Tschager
|
| | | | | (...) Steve, our opposing positions on RGBs are known. What I seek in this very moment is your position on the second question in this post: (URL) "No password, not a single CA-header edit on your agenda nor a library update since ... was it 2004 or (...) (15 years ago, 10-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) DOH! I forgot to include -- Part of the reason I think RGB colors are not the way to go is because they don't solve the real problem -- there are a good number of patterns that can't realistically be modeled in LDraw. Anything with gradients, (...) (15 years ago, 10-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
