Subject:
|
Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:57:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5273 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Travis Cobbs wrote:
|
Also, its kind of obvious that you and I would be biased on this issue.
When people complain that LDView or ldglite arent working right, all we can
do right now is say, Too bad. Theres nothing I can do to fix it. If
there were an official policy saying that T-junctions are bad, we could say,
The part needs to be updated.
|
T-junctions are a quality issue in part files. I dont think they should be
strictly forbidden (that is, having T-junctions is not a reason to hold a part
file from official release). Generally, I wouldnt even say that a part with
T-junctions needs a (Needs Work) tag. But I will encourage part authors to
avoid T-junctions. It is worth having a few more polygons to avoid the
rendering artifacts.
Sometimes, T-junctions can be avoided without any extra polygons -- its a
matter of knowing better ways to lay out polygons to cover a surface.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
|
| (...) Sounds reasonable to me. Any chance a T-junctions FAQ could be created on the parts tracker reference page, and the above could make it into a policy statement in the parts review FAQ? Most of my original post here could be used as the FAQ, (...) (18 years ago, 5-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
|
| (...) Much as I'd like to agree on this, I don't think the fact that nobody posted back then disagreeing with my statement really counts as consensus. I pointed out the problem, but didn't ask for opinions on whether parts should be modeled that (...) (18 years ago, 5-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|