Subject:
|
Re: Overlapping primitives - a reason to Hold a part?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Sun, 16 Jul 2006 10:59:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3199 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Travis Cobbs wrote:
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, William Howard wrote:
|
What is the policy on overlapping primitives in a part? Is it OK? Is it
frowned upon? Is it accepted as the norm? Is it only accepted under
exceptional circumstances? It excessive over-lapping of primitives (or
quads/tris) a reason to Hold a part? Is any over-lapping (beyond the
exceptional) a reason to Hold the part?
|
I dont know what the policy is (or if there is one), but I will point out
that it will likely cause artifacts in any transparent parts in any viewer
that supports blended transparency (such as LDView). The overlapping
sections will get drawn twice, making them a noticeably different shade.
Heres an example of a quad overlapping a disc drawn in transparent gray:
--Travis
|
Ahhh. Very good point. I think youd get problems in povray too.
Tim
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|