Subject:
|
Re: Peeron or BrickLink Name? 3003p???.dat - Brick 2 x 2 with Red Dot Pattern
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Apr 2006 17:07:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3186 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Steve Bliss wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> > I am strongly against the idea of a third name for parts like this.
>
> I agree. Keep in mind, once the LDraw part becomes official, Peeron typically
> updates their database to use the LDraw name.
>
> > What do you think, should I pick the Peeron name or the name used in Bricklink?
>
> Peeron name: Brick 2 x 2 with Red Dot Pattern
> Bricklink name: Brick, Decorated 2 x 2 with Dot Red on One Side Pattern
>
> I'd go with the Peeron name, because it's simpler. Unless there's another 2x2
> brick with a dot on multiple sides...
>
> Steve
Not any that I know of.
I'm afraid I wasn't clear enough in my question. Those "names" you quote are
what I call "descriptions". It's good to harmonize them too, of course. But the
differences are not as confusing as different part numbers are. But I mean the
file name (=part number). 3003pb06 or 3003px6? Or a third, exactly following the
LDraw naming conventions?
(The description conventions are much closer in Peeron and LDraw compared to BL
and LDraw.)
/Tore
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
