 | | Re: Part building advice - too many triangles/quads? —Ross Crawford
| | | | (...) I'm guessing you mean s\6898s01.dat :) ROSCO (20 years ago, 26-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Part building advice - too many triangles/quads? —Chris Dee
| | | | | (...) Yes, of course - now where did I leave that backslash? Chris (20 years ago, 28-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Part building advice - too many triangles/quads? —Travis Cobbs
| | | | | (...) Shouldn't it be a forward slash (s/6898s01.dat)? Parts use forward slash in the actual part code (which is good, because it makes viewers in other operating systems slightly easier to make). --Travis (20 years ago, 29-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Part building advice - too many triangles/quads? —Orion Pobursky
| | | | | (...) No, the back slash is correct. -Orion (20 years ago, 29-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| | | | | | |
