To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.partsOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 4904
4903  |  4905
Subject: 
Re: New Part - 3069bp0b.dat - Tile 1 x 2 with Minifig Portrait and Handprint Pattern
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
Date: 
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 22:31:10 GMT
Viewed: 
2083 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Willy Tschager wrote:
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Willy Tschager wrote:
hi folks,

I've just posted this part to the PT:
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/3069bp0b.dat

enjoy, w.

hi steffen,


At Thu Nov 13 14:28:01 2003, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
Whoah, Willy what a work. I'm impressed.

many thx for the praise :-)

Nevertheless, I have compared the part with the real world one
and found some differences:
- the pockets of the vest are not high enough - on the real
part you can see more of their vertical edges
- the minifig head's throat has thinner borders
- the vertical gaps between the bricks are smaller
- the upper left pocket has small vertical lines on its ends
- the central white spot below the minifig's throat is larger
- the 2 small bricks on the right side in the third row are smaller
If you'd like to have a part scan, contact me

hmm ... looks like there are more versions of this pattern out there. I based
the re-engineering on this scan:

<<http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Hollywood/Images/3069bp0b_scan.jpg>>

I have to admit that the quality of the scan is not the best and the passage:
real part -> scan -> vector graphics file -> dxf file -> dat file (just consider
the rounding form 6 digits to 3) gives room to a lot of error an mismatches, but
this is the best I could do or was willing to do ("the vertical gaps between the
bricks are smaller" for example was an authors choice to disthinguish them
better in a MLCad or LDview. initially I even tried to read what was written,
but in the end ... how much detail is enough and how much is too much ;-)

w.

There alway tends to be a minute amount a variation between pattern printings
from brick to brick.  I think your optimizations are well within accpetible
limits.  After all, we're not going for archival quality just the general idea.

-Orion



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New Part - 3069bp0b.dat - Tile 1 x 2 with Minifig Portrait and Handprint Pattern
 
(...) hi steffen, (...) many thx for the praise :-) (...) hmm ... looks like there are more versions of this pattern out there. I based the re-engineering on this scan: (URL) I have to admit that the quality of the scan is not the best and the (...) (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR