Subject:
|
Re: Part looked weird. . .
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Jul 2001 16:46:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1140 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, rmoody wrote:
> I was looking for the parts that came on the Sopwith Camel. Well, while
> looking at 6205 the Tile 6 x 16 with Studs on Edges, I noticed all the
> stud4.dat subparts were too low. I fixed that, but I don't know if my
> observations were correct. Anyway, here's the "fixed" part.
Yikes! That's a bad mistake. Thanks for supplying the fix.
You should be sure to forward this to parts@ldraw.org.
> 0 Author: Unknown, Modified by Ronald Scott Moody <RonaldScottMoody@netscape.net>
You can safely assume that any uncredited part was created by James
Jessiman.
Steve
Christopher! have you backed up your data?
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Part looked weird. . . [DAT]
|
| I was looking for the parts that came on the Sopwith Camel. Well, while looking at 6205 the Tile 6 x 16 with Studs on Edges, I noticed all the stud4.dat subparts were too low. I fixed that, but I don't know if my observations were correct. Anyway, (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
