 | | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo —Matt Schild
|
| | | (...) have. Possibly, either that or it's the difficulty of putting a 6 sided design on a 16 sided surface and trying to make it look right. (...) call (...) at (...) *ahem* that is exactly what this part is <i>supposed</i> to be. *sigh* back to the (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Whoops, sorry about that! Well, I think it needs more work then. I can't find a really definitive picture, but if you look here: (URL) scroll to the roof view: (URL) will see that the black outer circle is significantly less than the tile (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo —Matt Schild
|
| | | | (...) Actually, I'm drawing it from memory, which isn't working quite as well as I hoped it would (I've got the set that it's from, but it's in storage right now). I'm sure that if I had a part or a good close-up pic or scan that I could work from (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Part: 2x2 round tile with imperial logo —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Standard accepted practice in the parts authoring community is to *not* do this. That is, don't draw parts you don't actually have in front of you. That pic I posted is enough to tell that a part is "wrong" but not enough to tell that a part (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
