Subject:
|
Re: [name argument] train door vs. door
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 Jun 1999 02:12:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1188 times
|
| |
 | |
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999 17:06:26 GMT, "Jeff Stembel" <Dragonelf1@aol.com> wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Terry Keller writes:
> > On Mon, 31 May 1999 20:26:13 GMT, "Thomas Burger" <TBurger666@aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > > the parts 4181 and 4182 are doors right?
> > > yes there catigorized as train doors,should they be catagorized as just "doors"
> >
> > There are several (many) door/window parts in "Train" that should probably be
> > moved to the "Door" and "Window" categories. Just hasn't happened yet.
>
> What about moving 812 "Train Level Crossing Center Rail Cap Insert" to the
> "Tile" category? I have seven of them(one is broken tho. :( ), and none of
> them came in a Train set.
>
> Jeff
Really? Any idea of what they came in, and/or what the uses they had?
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:  | | Re: [name argument] train door vs. door
|
| (...) Of Course! 6383 Public Works Center and 6390 Main Street; two of the *best* town sets ever made. Both use them as rails for their cranes, 6383 has 3 and 6390 has 4. I've always considered them tiles. Jeff (26 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread: ![[name argument] train door vs. door -Thomas Burger (31-May-99 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: [name argument] train door vs. door -Terry Keller (1-Jun-99 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: [name argument] train door vs. door -Jeff Stembel (1-Jun-99 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif)    ![Re: [name argument] train door vs. door -Jeff Stembel (2-Jun-99 to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|