 | | Re: Edge lines in patterns
|
|
(...) Well :-) The short answer is that I was using 606p02 as a reference, and it has edge-lines... I have now been made aware that this wasn't the best example I could have picked :-D Anyway...I'm about to start an overhaul of all the 32x32 (...) (16 years ago, 19-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Edge lines in patterns
|
|
(...) I think we do not need to specify the use of edgelines more than we have done, if everybody knows what edgelines are and that in some cases they are not shown in pictures/renderings. So they should be as nature only on edges. If there are (...) (16 years ago, 17-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Edge lines in patterns
|
|
(...) The spec intentionally didn't put absolute limits on what color 24 could be used for, so I think it's up to the reviewers. My tendency would be to hold the part, but not because it does something that goes against the spec, but instead because (...) (16 years ago, 17-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Edge lines in patterns
|
|
Hi guys, I thought we had specs for almost everything, but I was proven wrong. Looking at this pattern (URL) see 24colored edges around the pattern. I was going to hold vote it, since I never "edged" a pattern - and I made a lot of them in my career (...) (16 years ago, 17-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw model of Spybotics programmable brick
|
|
(...) Philo, Congratulations! This is a fantastic part! LDraw sure has come a long way since its humble beginnings, and the ground breaking work by James. Kevin (16 years ago, 10-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.robotics.spybotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw model of Spybotics programmable brick
|
|
(...) Hard to tell... I worked on it on and off during 15 days. I would say about 10 hours. Philo (16 years ago, 9-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw model of Spybotics programmable brick
|
|
That is some seriously talented work! Can I ask how long it took you to create it? Scott (16 years ago, 9-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw model of Spybotics programmable brick
|
|
(...) SNIP (...) Great to see that parts now on the PT. Thank you Philo! cu mikeheide (16 years ago, 8-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.robotics.spybotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | LDraw model of Spybotics programmable brick
|
|
Linmix once said to me that he couldn't find a LDraw model of the (URL) Spybotics>... so I decided to cope with that beast. Here is the prevue: (2 URLs) The LDraw files are available from (URL) LDraw Parts Tracker>. Don't forget all the subfiles! (...) (16 years ago, 8-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.robotics.spybotics, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x784 Technic Gear Hailfire Droid Wheel
|
|
(...) Hello Amnon, You never submitted your Hailfire Droid Wheel to LDraw Parts Tracker, do you mind if I do so? (on your behalf of course!) Philo (16 years ago, 25-Apr-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | reviewer searched
|
|
I like to draw your attention to the following parts that need some reviews. (URL) (16 years ago, 18-Apr-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Help preparing L(EGO)Draw parts
|
|
(...) (2 URLs) file size reduced from 80 down to 59 KB (there could be done some more rect.dat substitution on the front). stud geometry was completely wrong as it is was in the other parts I had fixed. w. (16 years ago, 16-Apr-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Custom Minifig Torso DAT files.
|
|
(...) If it's any help, (URL) this torso DAT file> already contains borders which leave a nice rectangular opening in the front. Just delete everything that follows those lines and you may have an easier time adapting your images to fit the (...) (16 years ago, 7-Apr-08, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Custom Minifig Torso DAT files.
|
|
(...) Thanks Steve, I took your recommendation and tried Quad2Dat. I can see what you mean about it being buggy (and incomplete). It is too bad development on it didn't continue it seems to have a lot of potential. For simple images I can see it (...) (16 years ago, 7-Apr-08, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Custom Minifig Torso DAT files.
|
|
(...) My understanding is that you need to save often, with changing filenames. It apparently sometimes crashes during save after it has already clobbered the file. --Travis (16 years ago, 7-Apr-08, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Custom Minifig Torso DAT files.
|
|
(...) Neat! (...) For further work on custom torsos, I recommend grabbing the program called Quad 2 Dat. This is a fairly easy 2D program, made specifically for people creating LDraw patterned parts. The main problem with Quad2Dat is that it's (...) (16 years ago, 6-Apr-08, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Custom Minifig Torso DAT files.
|
|
I have been working at creating some custom Minifig Torso DAT files for LDraw. I should preface everything by saying that I am NOT an LDraw Parts author. All of these were created by essentially taking a plain torso file and applying these like a (...) (16 years ago, 6-Apr-08, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Is anyone working on 32745?
|
|
(...) I have send my first efforts already by email. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 30-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Is anyone working on 32745?
|
|
(...) Cool. We might actually get this very difficult part done. It may take a while but I'll try to get the inside bit mostly complete (easier than the outside). Then we can split the work into the harder bits... Tim PS. We should probaly shift to (...) (17 years ago, 28-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Is anyone working on 32745?
|
|
(...) I have never done in this way, but it sounds good. I think first step should be a mokup for the overall dimensions and the connection (axle hole etc) points. The fine tuning (ribs in frontside etc) should then be divided into areas for you and (...) (17 years ago, 28-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Is anyone working on 32745?
|
|
(...) Do you fancy a divide and conquer approach? If we each did different sections it might make it more possible. At the least it is a fairly easy part to subdivide. Tim (17 years ago, 28-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Is anyone working on 32745?
|
|
(...) I wanted to start that part some month ago, but at a closer look I decided to not doing it because it is a real challenge. But I want that part very, very much. So please go ahead and make my dream come true. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 27-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Is anyone working on 32745?
|
|
Hi all, Just thought I'd check to see if anyone was working on part 32475 ((URL) It's a horrid part to work on so I'm hoping someone has but realise it's probably unlikely. Thanks, Tim (17 years ago, 27-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Inappropriate(?) use of stud.dat in 30035.dat
|
|
(...) You are right, but there are only three lines of code (easily created with MLCad) that would be substituted with such a new primitive. I think it is not worth. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Inappropriate(?) use of stud.dat in 30035.dat
|
|
(...) OK, I sent an updated version to the tracker admins, and BFCd it while I was at it. --Travis (17 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Inappropriate(?) use of stud.dat in 30035.dat
|
|
(...) Perhaps if there was a unit capped cylinder in the primitives authors would not be driven to use studs? Philo (17 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of Power Functions Parts lacks consistency
|
|
(...) OK, I'll do that (no votes yet...) (...) I agree. Philo (17 years ago, 26-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Inappropriate(?) use of stud.dat in 30035.dat
|
|
(...) As far as I remember this is formally ok. But you are right, this should be avoided. Please correct that and send the file to the PT. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 25-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Inappropriate(?) use of stud.dat in 30035.dat
|
|
30035.dat uses stud.dat in a location that isn't really a stud, but is the same shape as a stud. This leads to a rendering problem if stud logos are enabled: (URL) (Notice the LEGO logo peeking out from under the pole.) Is the above considered (...) (17 years ago, 25-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of Power Functions Parts lacks consistency
|
|
(...) If there are no current votes on the part I suggest to resubmit them. If they have already a certify vote send an email to the admin with a link to the part and the change he should do. I think also "Electric Power Functions" is a good name (...) (17 years ago, 25-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of Power Functions Parts lacks consistency
|
|
(...) I should indeed have paid more attention to that. Would it be best to resubmit parts with correct name, or simply (for me!!!) do an admin edit? Philo (17 years ago, 25-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Naming of Power Functions Parts lacks consistency
|
|
Hi, the Power Functions parts currently at the PT are named: * 58119.dat - Electric Power Functions 9V Battery Box (Complete Shortcut) * 58120.dat - Electric Technic Power Functions Medium Motor Complete Shortcut * 58121.dat - Electric Technic Power (...) (17 years ago, 25-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Mars mission IV
|
|
(...) Hi Claude, If you need to model your rover, I just LDrawed the solar panel and the supercap... (2 URLs) Philo (17 years ago, 16-Mar-08, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Some mistakes in the last update
|
|
(...) I have just corrected the two mentioned errors (303223 and 4210698). cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 29-Feb-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Some mistakes in the last update
|
|
Hi, after download the latest update (well, last weekend or so), I manually checked the newer files against my installed parts (from mid 2007). Irritating was the followeing: 30255 moved to 30225 (where is old 30225) 30255p01 (why not moved to (...) (17 years ago, 29-Feb-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: confusion with parts
|
|
(...) Hi Ramiro, it is known that 6093 in LDD references (URL) in LDraw 6093 is (URL) - a complete mismatch. Problem is, that we can correct the error only after the real 6093 - Minifig Hair Ponytail has been authored and submitted to the PT. In the (...) (17 years ago, 27-Feb-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | confusion with parts
|
|
hi, first post. i'd like to know why this two parts are listed in LDraw as the same, i've been looking for that ponytail and it's nowhere to be found. Wig, Ponytail Element Id: 4211165 Design Id: 6093 Mini Wig, Girl Element Id: 4274410 Design Id: (...) (17 years ago, 27-Feb-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Exhaust Pipes 71137 and x855 misaligned
|
|
(...) Almost correct but a few rings are in the wrong place still. I have commented on the tracker. (17 years ago, 24-Feb-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting OT: Where are the latest official parts files?
|
|
(...) Thanks Travis. It seems a bit hidden to find. Now I know to check the zip from time to time. Lutz (17 years ago, 22-Feb-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting OT: Where are the latest official parts files?
|
|
(...) Look at the following post: (URL) you read that thread as a whole, you'll have a better understanding of the problem. However, the above post has a link to a page with a zip of all the unofficial parts (i.e., everything that's been added or (...) (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
