 | | please help me for x928cx1
|
|
HI, can somebody draw this part : (URL) ? I've tried but I'm only able to draw simple figure.. thank you Cris (17 years ago, 14-Dec-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Space Helmet with Hoses [DAT]
|
|
I've been meaning to work on this part for awhile, never got around to it. This file is a mockup -- it's not at all complete, some things are just wrong, etc. But it gets the point across. The file might rely on some unofficial primitives, I didn't (...) (17 years ago, 12-Dec-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader Update
|
|
mikeheide schrieb: (...) I just have uploaded a bugfix version (1.1.5) to my homepage (www.michael-heidemann.de). There was a problem if the first line after the header was a line like 0 BFC CERTIFY INVERTNEXT. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 5-Dec-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw part discrepancies
|
|
(...) sorry for insisting on this but we still have no answers. if you have this parts please measure! w. (17 years ago, 4-Dec-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 2359p01/80567 2359p01/80546
|
|
(...) things appear more complicated than at first sight. as you might know the company distinguishes between Item IDs and Design ID but sometimes the numbering is not consistent due to a different scheme in the past. instead of deciding on single (...) (17 years ago, 4-Dec-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 44572 is smooth (Sorry for double posting)
|
|
(...) ...and it is used for both transparent and opaque colors Philo (17 years ago, 28-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 2582/6139 Sloped Panel with Hinge are different.
|
|
(...) As far as I can tell, 6139 is the design number of transparent parts, 2582 the number of plain ones. They indeed deserve different numbers in LDraw. Philo (17 years ago, 28-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 44572 is smooth (Sorry for double posting)
|
|
In addition, It seems the new version (with click-hinge) 44572 is smooth only. (17 years ago, 28-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 2582/6139 Sloped Panel with Hinge are different.
|
|
Hi, again while reviewing LGEO parts I noticed back in 1997 I did 2852 in LGEO with a bumpy surface as standard slopes have. Of course you cannot see this in LDRAW. Most common version of this part are transparent and have a smooth surface in real (...) (17 years ago, 28-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 2582/6139 Sloped Panel with Hinge are different.
|
|
Hi, again while reviewing LGEO parts I noticed back in 1997 I did 2852 in LGEO with a bumpy surface as standard slopes have. Of course you cannot see this in LDRAW. Most common version of this part are transparent and have a smooth surface in real (...) (17 years ago, 28-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Racers Track
|
|
(...) I just have started to make all these files. I have already very mockups ready, so the overall dimensions are ok. Now I "only" need to model these. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 27-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Stl2dat settings?
|
|
(...) Could you please add this piece of info to your site, thx? (...) Also on this a bit of info would save the day. I experimented a bit with the values and it would be helpful if you could explain what happens if you increase or lower the values (...) (17 years ago, 25-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 2359p01/80567 2359p01/80546
|
|
(...) :-)))...))) (...) A correct answer can only be given by the PT admins. But fact is that 80546 has been released in 2004 when we didn't have access to all the part number sources we have today. thx for pointing out anyway - I'll see if we get (...) (17 years ago, 23-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 2359p01/80567 2359p01/80546
|
|
Hi, while doing some more patterned baseplates for LGEO (Yes, I am working on it, doing some fixing and adding more patterned parts for the time now), I discovered the road pattern version on 2358 road 7 stud straight, 2358p01 was moved to 80547. (...) (17 years ago, 19-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Name of part Train Base 4 x 8 with Wheels Holder
|
|
(...) If you mean (URL) that is called "Train Base 4 x 7 with Wheels Holder". mikeheide (17 years ago, 16-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Name of part Train Base 4 x 8 with Wheels Holder
|
|
Why is part 824 named 'Train Base 4 x 8 with Wheels Holder', while it's dimensions are 4 x 7 ? Niels Karsdorp (17 years ago, 4-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Confusion on the PT, please help
|
|
(...) SNIP (...) This was a pending post. The problem is already solved and the parts on the pt new uploaded of on hold. I am waiting to send a delete list until the converting process is finished. mikeheide (17 years ago, 14-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2609b
|
|
(...) Have you already finished these parts? I would like to see them on the PT. (17 years ago, 11-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Confusion on the PT, please help
|
|
I just try to minimize the hold votes on the PT and have overseen some files. To clearify you find below all information. My suggestion is the following: The part numbers I have used are the standard for stickers, so they should be used. The submits (...) (17 years ago, 4-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Stl2dat settings?
|
|
Hi, (...) for teps (EG. 0.1) when the coordinates in the stl file have to few decimals. (...) The -deps value controls if two triangles can be merged to a quad. This value is related to the -det option of l3p -check (...) The STL format produced by (...) (17 years ago, 9-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Stl2dat settings?
|
|
Hi folks, as a stl2dat toddler I'd like to know what kind of settings you use for the conversion with a spot on: -eps value (default 0.01) -teps value : minimum distance for coincidence (default 0.001) -deps value : maximum determinant for coplanar (...) (17 years ago, 9-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Stl2dat settings?
|
|
Hi folks, as a stl2dat toddler I'd like to know what kind of settings you use for the conversion with a spot on: -eps value (default 0.01) -teps value : minimum distance for coincidence (default 0.001) -deps value : maximum determinant for coplanar (...) (17 years ago, 9-Nov-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-fluo trans orange?
|
|
(...) You're right. My mistake. -Orion (17 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-fluo trans orange?
|
|
(...) I don't know what LEGO color T182 is, but based on Philippe's title, I'm guessing it's the (relatively) new trans orange (non-fluorescent). Assuming this is the case, then color 57 isn't it. --Travis (17 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-fluo trans orange?
|
|
(...) Per the ldconfig.ldr ((URL) file, color 57 is correct. -Orion (17 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2609b
|
|
Dean Earley schrieb: (...) Hi, the current 2609 should be renamed to 2609a. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2609b
|
|
Dean Earley schrieb: (...) Hi, maybe this (URL) helps. I only have one part and that has also a groove. On the pictures also only parts with groove are shown. So maybe it has always grooves. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2609b
|
|
(...) As I'm rewriting 2609 to make use of a load more primitives, is there a version of either of these without the groove? The current LDraw part doesn't but all my real pieces do. (17 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Part 2609b
|
|
Hi all. I have a magnet holder labelled 2609 but is about 4 LDU taller than the current part. Shall I just submit it as 2609b and what needs to be done with the current 2609? Thanks (17 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Non-fluo trans orange?
|
|
How should LEGO color T182 be coded? These parts: (URL) Ldraw color 57 but this is not correct... Philo (17 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: NonCA-parts in need of re-writing
|
|
(...) Part 905.dat and 905c01.dat done! (sometimes it takes a bit ;-) I have updated the page at ldraw.org - (URL) as well as the Wiki - (URL) please give the Re-writes - (URL) high priority! w. (17 years ago, 22-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw part discrepancies
|
|
(...) hi folks, we still seek some input on the parts above. if you have the real version of those please measure/compare and let us know. w. (17 years ago, 17-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New POV-dat: 3062bL46.dat - Brick 1 x 1 Round Yellow with POV Light
|
|
(...) It depends. Do you want the light to act more like it would through LEGO parts or do you want it to imitate a real car's headlights...? Anyway, the choice the user's. All you have to do is write the spotlight definitions ans run it through (...) (17 years ago, 16-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New POV-dat: 3062bL46.dat - Brick 1 x 1 Round Yellow with POV Light
|
|
(...) strange when the headlights cast shadows backwards :-) (17 years ago, 16-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New POV-dat: 3062bL46.dat - Brick 1 x 1 Round Yellow with POV Light
|
|
(...) At least, Jonathan's car now has gotten its original headlights back now - yet yellow instead of white. (URL) (17 years ago, 16-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New POV-dat: 3062bL46.dat - Brick 1 x 1 Round Yellow with POV Light
|
|
(...) Sorry, don't have the time to make models right now. I am currently writing a program to automatically create dat files of "shining" parts. I call it datshine.exe and I am very excited over it. Well, here's one quite strange model I rushed (...) (17 years ago, 15-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New POV-dat: 3062bL46.dat - Brick 1 x 1 Round Yellow with POV Light
|
|
(...) Pictures, we want pictures :-) (17 years ago, 15-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New POV-dat: 3062bL46.dat - Brick 1 x 1 Round Yellow with POV Light [DAT]
|
|
(...) Thanks Anders! Only took half a year from idea to completion on this part ... /Tore 0 Brick 1 x 1 Round with Hollow Stud Yellow with POV Light 0 Name: 3062bL46.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial part 0 // based on work by James Jessiman (...) (17 years ago, 15-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw part discrepancies
|
|
(...) against official or non-official (...) differences. (...) comment? (LUT version may not match real parts, see (...) I measured the real part and confirm that the LUT-part is correct! Matching the PT-Version (Trans-White) with the LUT-Version (...) (17 years ago, 11-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Are multiple AUTHOR tags legit?
|
|
(...) I think there should only ever be one primary author - nowadays, the one that takes the responsibility of submitting to the Parts Tracker. During the CA header migration, where I have encountered this and assessed that it was a true (...) (17 years ago, 11-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
