To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.partsOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / *6627 (-40)
  Re: Parts vs subparts for compound parts
 
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Niels Karsdorp wrote: (I've > read that there's a major update on classic windows in the pipeline.) (...) Yes, see (URL) This shows how I decided to organise these files a while back. The CA header conversion is nearing (...) (17 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Parts vs subparts for compound parts
 
(...) "A part I can buy" is not how we determine where to place a file. Since x322 represents a solid piece that a modeler may need to interact with directly (that is, give it a color). Looking at the files involved, the file locations and (...) (17 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Parts vs subparts for compound parts
 
(...) SNIP (...) For to solve the hold vote on this part, I think, that the current x322.dat should go into the s/ folder because this is not a PART that I can buy. So the file with the metal portion should be instead x322.dat and with the light (...) (17 years ago, 7-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  L(EGO)Draw part discrepancies
 
I have checked LEGO Universe Team parts ((URL) official or non-official parts when they exist, and noticed several differences. Could anyone who own some of these parts (I don't) check these differences and comment? (LUT version may not match real (...) (17 years ago, 6-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)  
 
  Re: Preparing a L(EGO)Draw part for the Parts Tracker – A review
 
(...) hmm ... looks like we got the "ideal" version as it has been projected by the part designers but the part was modified during the production. fact is we stick to the actual part as it comes out of the box and we will have to get rid off the (...) (17 years ago, 5-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Preparing a L(EGO)Draw part for the Parts Tracker – A review
 
(...) it's a fine prog, anders! nonetheless I really wish it were a part of LDDP and not just a plug in - it doesn't allow polling to a viewer while I edit figures and to me visual feedback is crucial. BTW could you please check why Syncedit wipes (...) (17 years ago, 5-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Preparing a L(EGO)Draw part for the Parts Tracker – A review
 
(...) Hey! I have a user :-) Cool! Now I *must* update the web site... (17 years ago, 4-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Preparing a L(EGO)Draw part for the Parts Tracker – A review
 
Thanks, Willy, for this very informative article... I discovered many things (among them, Syncedit that looks VERY interesting - how did I miss its announcement???). (...) Here you had a favorable situation with mostly flat surfaces. Similarly I (...) (17 years ago, 4-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Preparing a L(EGO)Draw part for the Parts Tracker – A review
 
When the Lego Universe Team has started to share rough data of 80 parts (URL) and soon after I've got feedback from part authors that because of their excellent quality those parts were heavyweights and would give us a hard time reducing the file (...) (17 years ago, 4-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) ! 
 
  Re: Are multiple AUTHOR tags legit?
 
I think a part should only have one AUTHOR line (although, as you say, this is not stated in the library header spec) If a part has two or more authors, it falls into one of two possibilities a) Original author and one or more part modifier/updaters (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Are multiple AUTHOR tags legit?
 
I've noticed that a number of official parts have multiple 0 AUTHOR meta statements in the part header. All the ones I've seen so far have James Jessiman as the first author, and someone else as the second one. Is this the correct way to indicate (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
 
  Re: Anyone working on monorail tracks?
 
(...) Hi Mike, I begun the parts some months ago but hadn't enough time to go further with them. I will send you the parts by mail. CU Bernd (17 years ago, 22-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Anyone working on monorail tracks?
 
(...) Is there any DAT file that reflects the efforts doing these two pieces. Also a mockup will help me. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 17-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
 
  DATHeader Update
 
I have uploaded a new version (1.1.4) to my homepage (www.michael-heidemann.de). With this version also the lastest changes to the Official Parts Header Specification are maintained. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 13-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Problem with part 30208.dat
 
Please upload this version to the PT. Only by this it can be corrected completly. It is now so many years an official part and nowbody has realized that it was wrong. Your version works fine as I can see. There are also missing inner lines. So (...) (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Problem with part 30208.dat  [DAT]
 
(...) Not necessary here, I just scaled the dome a bit to reduce size by 4 ldu. DAT file joined, tell me if it's ok now... Philo 0 Cylinder 4 x 4 Hemisphere Multifaceted 0 Name: 30208.DAT 0 Author: John VanZwieten 0 Official LCad update 99-02 0 // (...) (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Problem with part 30208.dat
 
(...) Yep, I think you are right. The 30208.dat part appears to be 4 LDU too tall, unless there are more than one brick version of this part. Unfortunate, because to correct it will probably take a complete reworking of the part. -Matt :) ---...--- (...) (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Problem with part 30208.dat
 
I recently CAD'd my Tequila Sunrise locomotive, which uses the part 30208.dat, Cylinder 4 x 4 Hemisphere Multifaceted. As you can see in the render, the part is overlapping the arch piece on the boiler: (URL) I built this locomotive in real life (...) (17 years ago, 10-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
 
(...) I see that the (URL) stl2dat page> has had its instructions updated. As I re-read them, I see that the -o5 option turns off generation of optional lines for concave faces (as of 1.13), and that they are on by default. Do you know if the (...) (17 years ago, 10-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
 
  Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
 
(...) to ease access to the data we uploaded and linked the rough parts to the site: (URL) - don't forget to email us if you plan to fix a part in order to avoid overlapping work. w. LDraw Administration Team (17 years ago, 10-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Part 2347
 
(...) -- Jindroush (17 years ago, 9-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Part 2347
 
(...) (URL) (17 years ago, 9-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Part 2347
 
Hi, I'm looking for a kind soul with lots of free time to make part 2347 Excavator Bucket 3 x 5 with Teeth. ;) I'm trying to make instructions of my skid steer loader, and if I'm not mistaken, it's the last part I'm missing. For instructions, mockup (...) (17 years ago, 9-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Tyres Question about 6578 and 2993
 
It seems to me that the tyre 6578 and 2993 at peeron are the same part. On Bricklink there is no part with the number 2993. Can somebody else give me his ok, that the parts are the same? cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 9-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: DATHeader New Release
 
(...) Mike, Feel free to email me (or Travis) directly if you want to discuss the impact on DATHeader of the latest change to the !LDRAW_ORG meta-statement William (17 years ago, 7-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: DATHeader New Release
 
mikeheide schrieb: (...) I forgot to mention that the version number has to be 1.1.3 or later. All version up to 1.1.2 can only write back to file 65.000 bytes. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 4-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: DATHeader ALERT!
 
Dean Earley schrieb: (...) Yes, you are right. The last step before writing to disc was to put all in a text box. So stupid. Fixing was easy and should have not rise other problems in this case. Many thanks for your hint. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 4-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
 
  DATHeader New Release
 
The problem is fixed. Now it should be possible to process files with approx. size by 1.5 GByte. Sorry for the trouble that maybe caused this bug to you. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 4-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Racers Track
 
I found the Racers track straight as an LDRAW part, listed under "Sports Track 8 x 16 Straight", "parts/42936.dat": (URL) anyone have a file or work-in-progress for the curve, part 42938? See Bricklink's list of parts, under "Track System": (URL) (...) (17 years ago, 3-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: DATHeader ALERT!
 
(...) I seem to recall it was written in VB? If so, the VB text box has a content size limit of 65K. The only way around this is to work on an in memory string buffer and not store (and read back) the result in the text box. (17 years ago, 2-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
 
  DATHeader ALERT!
 
Please do not use DATHeader on files that exceed 64k because they will be cut at 64k. I will investigate that problem later. I fixed the problem that I had by mirrored subfiles. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 2-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
 
(...) hi guys, sorry for the late reply ... I'm abroad until next week and unfortunately I lack a proper connection to the net. anyway ... I started distributing the first parts. please mail me directly if you wanna have parts for the file (...) (17 years ago, 29-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
 
(...) Oh, yeah, forgot about that. I think that was even brought up the last time I was involved in such a discussion. --Travis (17 years ago, 27-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
 
  Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
 
(...) But you should still see them on transparent parts, right? Don (17 years ago, 27-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
 
  Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
 
(...) I see in the stl2dat release notes for version 1.12 an options -o5 (which isn't in the documented options list above) that makes it generate convex optional edges (I think it means concave). That's probably why the inner part isn't smooth in (...) (17 years ago, 27-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
 
  Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
 
(...) The current public version (1.12) of stl2dat set the face color to green or blue when the face contains degenerated triangles (with 2 or 3 coincident points) in the original stl file. This information can be used to clean the result file. I (...) (17 years ago, 27-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
 
  Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
 
(...) It looks like the program used to convert these was not perfect. I’m bet we just need to add the correct edge-color and main-color to the areas that are green and blue. Gallagher (17 years ago, 27-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
 
  Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
 
(...) Digital Designer and the LDraw System Of Tools. This relationship has led (...) This is great news indeed. I am happy to see this collaboration between LDraw and LEGO (especially since I see (URL) parts> I have been (URL) looking for> in this (...) (17 years ago, 27-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
 
  Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
 
That's great news. Just out of curiosity, do the green and blue bits have any significance, or are they just random? Since LDView was used for the part images, and there are plenty of smooth curves, it appears that stl2dat did a reasonably good job (...) (17 years ago, 27-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
 
  L(EGO)Draw parts
 
Hi folks, as announced in this thread: (URL) members of the Steering Committee (SteerCo) have been in contact with LEGO to look at ways of working together to ease the conversion between the LEGO Digital Designer and the LDraw System Of Tools. This (...) (17 years ago, 27-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.announce, FTX) !! 


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more | 40 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR