|
|
 | | Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
|
| (...) Yes, that's true, but in such cases there are generally lines separating the polygons (parts), and people expect to see those in the render. The problem we're talking about here is artifacts showing up on the faces of individual parts where (...) (17 years ago, 7-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions [DAT]
|
| Something else to consider is that T junctions will often appear in model files themselves between two parts as shown in this simple example. 0 Model exported from LeoCAD 0 Original name: 1 4 20.00 -24.00 30.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 (...) (17 years ago, 7-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
|
| (...) No there's not. I'm a physicist... not an engineer ;) Tim (17 years ago, 6-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
|
| (...) blah, blah, blah, snip Oops, I was trying to be all ironical in a geeky math sorta way. But apparently I failed. Guess I shoulda used more winkies... Do people still use winkies? Or have they gone obsolete like ASCII art? Anyhow, sorry about (...) (17 years ago, 6-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
|
| (...) There is, however, such a thing as an impractical problem ;) ROSCO (17 years ago, 6-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
|
