 | | Re: Non square stud groups?
|
|
(...) Search for "stug" and you'll find some threads about this. The biggest problem I see is one of confusion and consequent complication. Due to stud orientation you cannot rotate a 1x4 stud group by 90 degrees to get a 4x1 stud group - so you (...) (18 years ago, 8-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Non square stud groups?
|
|
(...) Search for "stug" and you'll find some threads about this. The biggest problem I see is one of confusion and consequent complication. Due to stud orientation you cannot rotate a 1x4 stud group by 90 degrees to get a 4x1 stud group - so you (...) (18 years ago, 8-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
Niels Bugge schrieb: (...) You can give my new program DATHeader (Windows) a try to maintain the correct header. First Bug fixes are made, so I think it could be useful for you. cu MikeHeide (18 years ago, 8-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
(...) Yes, as an author you will need to worry about it for newly submitted parts, because the Parts Tracker submit process will start checking for adherence to this. We will take care of the existing officlal library and the files currently on the (...) (18 years ago, 7-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
I'm sorry if this question has ben brought up in other threads, but I'm really streached thin with real life business at the moment and can't really follow the pt or lugnet (at least for the next half year). ...I'd just like to know if this header (...) (18 years ago, 6-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
