|
| | Part 41770 certified but missing sub-file??
|
| I recently downloaded the latest batch of parts from the LDraw Parts Tracker, and found three parts that were missing sub-files. Part 41769.dat & 41770.dat (Wing 2 x 4 Left/Right) both require sub-part s/41770s01.dat, but the sub-file isnt listed on (...) (20 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | Re: Conditional lines on sloped wedge parts 43720 and 43721
|
| (...) I have made a 43720.inc for the test of the coming L3PPARTS. The mathematical description of the surface is: 80x + 40y + yz = 0 and I have used the POV primitive quadric: quadric { <0,0,0>, <0,0,1>, <80,40,0>, 0 clipped_by { box { <-20,0,-40>, (...) (20 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | Re: Conditional lines on sloped wedge parts 43720 and 43721
|
| (...) I think the key difference is the twisted nature of this surface. I think the twist makes it impossible to partition the surface into polygons without having a mix of convex and concave seams. I'd like to be proven wrong. I don't have one of (...) (20 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| | | | Re: Conditional lines on sloped wedge parts 43720 and 43721
|
| (...) Oh, I don't know about that 1 pixel business. The problem with the surface as it's currently written, is that it flip-flops between convex and concave every at every triangle. But if you ignore the triangles and spin the surface around a bit, (...) (20 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| | | | Re: Conditional lines on sloped wedge parts 43720 and 43721
|
| (...) I'm pretty sure that's going to be the problem with *any* partition of this surface into polygons. Having a mathematical description of the surface would be good, because then we could potentially create a primitive for the surface, and (...) (20 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| |