 | | Re: Revised Arched Latticed WIndow Pane
|
|
(...) No problem, you're welcome. (...) I'm certain it will be. (...) Yeah, well... :-) a) I overstated things just a _bit_ to Todd. I *have* all but stopped reading LUGNET unless and until there's a new vote in which case Terry wakes me up and (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Revised Arched Latticed WIndow Pane
|
|
Hi Joshua, (...) Thanks for the information. I've submitted it to Terry, hopefully it will be in the next vote. Adam PS. Glad to have you back :) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Revised Arched Latticed WIndow Pane
|
|
Adam Howard wrote: <snip> (...) <snip> (...) Traditional procedure would be to submit to Terry, and let the Numbers Group provide the number (if possible). -- joshua (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: final version of the baseplate 32 x 32 raised with ramp
|
|
i am saying that i have fixed every single problem that i can find with the piece including the ones pointed out to me. the only known issue with the piece is the rounded edged and i have been told that i do not have to do those (25 years ago, 11-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: final version of the baseplate 32 x 32 raised with ramp
|
|
(...) Jonathan, Does "I hope they have all been fixed" mean: (a) you're uncertain whether you have actually fixed the problems that people pointed out to you; or (b) you're hoping other people will continue to do your work for you, and point out (...) (25 years ago, 11-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
