| |
On Mon, 31 May 1999 13:08:13 GMT, "Kevin B" <kevinb01@netfocus.net> wrote:
>
> Jamie Obrien <jamien@interworx.com.au> wrote in message
> news:3750dfc8.5054721@lugnet.com...
> > On Wed, 19 May 1999 22:14:40 GMT, "Duane Hess" <DNJHESS@ZDNETMAIL.COM>
> > wrote:
> > Quick question shouldn't the nose be part 3939 instaead of 3942?
> >
> > > 1 7 0 -30 -136 1 0 0 0 0.00 -1 0 1 0.00 3942.DAT
> >
> >
> >
> > Jamie
>
> Depends on wether or not you have the latest updates. Evidently the numbers
> of the 3940 "Slope Brick 33 3 x 6", 3939 "Cone 2 x 2 x 2", and the 3942
> "Cone 4 x 4 x 2" were incorrect, and were changed to 3939, 3942, and 3943
> respectivly.
>
> At least I HOPE this is what happened..... ;)
Yep. That is what happened. I cringed when I found out about the need for
those particular changes.
> Bad thing is is that I have a BUNCH of Classic Space .dats on my website
> that have to be changed to the new numbers..... ;(
My sincerest apologies for that. I feel your pain. :-/
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 6824 Space Dart-I
|
| Jamie Obrien <jamien@interworx.com.au> wrote in message news:3750dfc8.505472...net.com... (...) Depends on wether or not you have the latest updates. Evidently the numbers of the 3940 "Slope Brick 33 3 x 6", 3939 "Cone 2 x 2 x 2", and the 3942 (...) (25 years ago, 31-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
