|
|
 | | Re: Datsville Rev039 - Micro Update
|
| (...) Thanks! I noticed that one, but was worried I missed something else as well. (...) I will take a look at these. Mike (13 years ago, 18-Sep-11, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
| | | | | Re: Datsville Unoff_v1_0_0
|
| (...) That's because there is no order other than first come, first serve. Nor is a fixed order possible unless you design the town using some algorithm. This is like a typical database. (...) Yes, it does belong to a block, #21. (...) The old (...) (13 years ago, 17-Sep-11, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
| | | | | Fishing for traffic?
|
| (...) I tell you, you are jumping into conclusiones. "Fishing for traffic from EB" - LOL! C'mon seriously, is that what you really believe? You must mean something like: "SweLUG is dead. Long live SweBrick.se! SweLUG is dead. Long live SweBrick.se! (...) (13 years ago, 16-Sep-11, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Datsville Unoff_v1_0_0
|
| (...) Hmm, I'm aware that I said I'll give you quite free hands, but well... First, the order of those blocks are a little strange to me: 20,19,18 14,15,16,17 13,4,3,1,2 12,5,6,7,8 9,10,11 (and building #45 does not even belong to any block?) I (...) (13 years ago, 14-Sep-11, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
| | | | | Re: Datsville submission
|
| (...) Hi Tore, LTNS! I can understand Superkalles reaction. Dilvish (who started the thread) is new to Eurobricks and is fishing for traffic _from_ EB. It's almost never considered good practice anywhere. Your reaction seems a bit strong however, (...) (13 years ago, 14-Sep-11, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
|
