|
In lugnet.build, Jon Palmer wrote:
> I like it Steve. I really like the simplicity of the first version as well.
> The second version reminds me of something I've been working on for a new
> model:
>
> http://www.oklahoma.net/~jpalmer/dsc00937.jpg
> http://www.oklahoma.net/~jpalmer/dsc00938.jpg
>
> The cylinders are a perfect fit. They just barely touch each other. The
> only problem is I only have 3 of the technic 3 bladed rotor piece. If I had
> one more it would be perfect. (2 on each end.)
Very nice! I thought about using the rotor piece to hold six tanks
(since I knew the geometry would work out nicely), but I didn't want to
have the 'brackets' on the end of the tanks.
Plus, I have plenty of 3-long technic beams and spare light-sabre blades
(the frame takes 6 of each).
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Another Space Probe
|
| I like it Steve. I really like the simplicity of the first version as well. The second version reminds me of something I've been working on for a new model: (URL) cylinders are a perfect fit. They just barely touch each other. The only problem is I (...) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.build)
|
4 Messages in This Thread: ![Another Space Probe -Steve Bliss (13-Feb-02 to lugnet.cad.dat.models)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Another Space Probe -Jon Palmer (13-Feb-02 to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.build)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Another Space Probe -Richard Marchetti (13-Feb-02 to lugnet.cad.dat.models)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|