 | | Re: Baroque Church Facade
|
|
Thanks Can you elaborate more on your suggested change? I'm a newbie to this stuff, and just use MLCAD for all editing. I never mess with the actual text files or part properties. If you can describe the effect of your suggested change, it would be (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Small Robot fits all space themes
|
|
That thing is really quite elegant. -- ---...--- If athletes get athlete's foot, do astronauts get mistletoe? ---...--- ~mek~ (News group readers, remove cc from atkincc to email me) Ryan J Farrington wrote in message (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Baroque Church Facade
|
|
(...) FWIW, I find that changing "0.707107" to "0.707" (i.e., three digits of precision) is sufficiently precise, and helps avoid line-wrap. Franklin (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Is it appropriate to post large models here?
|
|
(...) Nah, don't worry about it with small files. Your "Baroque Church Facade" post was only 47,684 bytes (about 46.5 KB) -- still pretty small. You'd have to be posting 500 KB files often in order to cause a problem. --Todd [xfut -> lugnet.cad] (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Is it appropriate to post large models here?
|
|
I've posted two decent sized .dat models here recently (St Marks and the Baroque Church). Is this appropriate? Is there any danger of using up too much disk space? Should we only post if there are requests (I could just post pictures from my web (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
