 | | Fixing the liftarms
|
|
Hi all (and especially Chris Dee), I find the inconsistency in the naming of liftarms in LDraw to be quite frustrating and was wondering whether or not it would be worth setting a standard name class and sticking to it. Here's a sample list: Technic (...) (18 years ago, 20-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | personal OMR (now 884 sets)
|
|
I have just added some more sets to my OMR. You can find that at (URL) you find errors, please let me know so I can correct that. have fun mikeheide (18 years ago, 18-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 2nd batch
|
|
(...) Thanks. 30172.dat and 47847.dat will be posted soon, 30135 a bit later. Philo (18 years ago, 8-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 2nd batch
|
|
(...) Philo, I added the submission dates to the chart. Pick it from the list. w. (18 years ago, 8-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 2nd batch
|
|
Hi Willy, (...) What about the mention "0 !HISTORY 2007-08-25 {The LEGO Universe Team} Original part shape" for these new parts? Should we change the date? Philo (18 years ago, 6-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC Updates
|
|
(...) Yes! I was already planning on writing a tutorial. It may not be ready until after the new year, though. -Mike (18 years ago, 28-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC Updates
|
|
(...) Hey thats great. I would have an instruction how to do such a tour. Can you make that and made it public? cu mikeheide (18 years ago, 28-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC Updates
|
|
(...) All right! The panoramic tour is online: (URL) (18 years ago, 28-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 2nd batch
|
|
(...) I woudln't bother pushing this. LEGO is being very nice to the fan community by providing us parts in LDRAW DAT format. I'd leave it at that. Jeff (18 years ago, 23-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts - 2nd batch
|
|
(...) For sure it would be best to get a file format closer from the original design (.stl for example), to be able to tweak stl2dat parameters for better results. Or to create directly POV versions... Philo (18 years ago, 23-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
