 | | Re: Lego XML? —Cary Clark
| | | | (...) ... (...) Let me expand on that. An XML color can be an abstraction that is defined somewhere else. So the attribute color="red" can mean LEGO red in the LEGO namespace, but some other red (like 0xFF0000) in the XHTML namespace, for instance. (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Lego XML? —Gustavo Patow
| | | | | | Hi: Let me add my two cents: As I hope you ALL know :-), I'm working with a student of mine in a new verison of LeoCAD called LeoCAM, which main feature is the ability to connect parts by their connectors (like axles, axle-holes, stud,stud-inles). (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Lego XML? —Leonardo Zide
| | | | | (...) Color is a bad concept when you're making parts, it would be much better to have a material library instead. For example, currently we use the same black color to describe tires, the reflective sides of bricks and the non-smooth sides of (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | |
