 | | Re: Announcing LEGO Digital Designer 1.0 — Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) Honestly, I don't see any benefits for the LCAD community in supporting the LXF format, unless the LXF format is so many more light years ahead of the LDraw format that the effort of supporting LXF would be miniscule compared to the benefits. (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Announcing LEGO Digital Designer 1.0 —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | I have been watching this thread with interest. Personally I find the prospect that LEGO is going to potentially open up some of their intellectual property to the community pretty interesting and not something you see happen very often. How they do (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Announcing LEGO Digital Designer 1.0 — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) I agree and I think it'll represent a great step toward enhanced collaboration with the community. (...) I don't get that impression... I think LEGO will strive to work with the LCAD/LDraw community to establish new standards. I think the (...) (22 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Announcing LEGO Digital Designer 1.0 —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) I don't think that's really a fair and answerable question. As a parts designer, I'd rather work in the format that is (a) the least work for me and (b) gives me the results I want. As a parts designer, I'm not terribly concerned about (...) (22 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
