 | | Re: What's wrong with the L-CAD list? —Tim Courtney
|
| | | (...) Wild. Will we then get all the loads of messages sent to the server in its downtime?? -Tim <>< (26 years ago, 1-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: What's wrong with the L-CAD list? —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | (...) there (...) send (...) Does someone have a list of e-mail addresses of those on the list. Perhaps we should send a message to everyone letting them know what's going on and how they can join the discussions here. -John Van (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What's wrong with the L-CAD list? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, I've got one around here somewhere. You can get one by sending an email to listserv@listserv.uh.edu. In the body, type REVIEW L-CAD. Steve (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What's wrong with the L-CAD list? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | I think it's back. But the long delay reminds me that we have an open question on the table about gating/converting (which I think we were talking about in admin.general, no? I forget. (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What's wrong with the L-CAD list? —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <36B72B0D.445D0F37@v...er.net>... (...) Yes, and here on lugnet.cad. A discussion needs to be started on LCAD to see what everyone there thinks about the move. (I'll probably wait until tommorrow so we don't (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
