 | | Re: What's wrong with the L-CAD list?
|
|
(...) It's only been a week (ok, maybe 1.5). Anyway, the list stalled because there is a daily limit of 50 messages, and we exceeded that. Until the list is manually reactivated by the owner (or some administrator at UH), it won't send any messages. (...) (26 years ago, 31-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: What's wrong with the L-CAD list?
|
|
(...) Wild. Will we then get all the loads of messages sent to the server in its downtime?? -Tim <>< (26 years ago, 1-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: What's wrong with the L-CAD list?
|
|
(...) there (...) send (...) Does someone have a list of e-mail addresses of those on the list. Perhaps we should send a message to everyone letting them know what's going on and how they can join the discussions here. -John Van (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: What's wrong with the L-CAD list?
|
|
(...) Yeah, I've got one around here somewhere. You can get one by sending an email to listserv@listserv.uh.edu. In the body, type REVIEW L-CAD. Steve (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: What's wrong with the L-CAD list?
|
|
I think it's back. But the long delay reminds me that we have an open question on the table about gating/converting (which I think we were talking about in admin.general, no? I forget. (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: What's wrong with the L-CAD list?
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <36B72B0D.445D0F37@v...er.net>... (...) Yes, and here on lugnet.cad. A discussion needs to be started on LCAD to see what everyone there thinks about the move. (I'll probably wait until tommorrow so we don't (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.general)
|
