To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 5463
5462  |  5464
Subject: 
Re: Let's be realistc (WasRe:MoreVenomAnyone? (WasRe:Givethemabreak (was:Hey,like,isanyonethere?)))
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad, lugnet.general
Date: 
Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:41:00 GMT
Viewed: 
1144 times
  
"James Brown" <galliard@shades-of-night.com> wrote in message
news:G8npDr.Ep3@lugnet.com...
In lugnet.cad, Charles Eric McCarthy writes:
Why exactly do the people going to the "Train summit" or "CAD summit"
need to sign NDAs and to get inside information?  You don't need
to sign an NDA to share your ideas with TLC.  So I conclude that
the desire among the participants to learn inside information is
greater than their desire to be able to speak freely.  Or maybe
they haven't thought of it in those terms yet.
(This is a general comment, not directed to any participant in
particular.)

Well, I'm not someone under an NDA, nor have I played on on TV, but...

The simple answer is "Because LEGO Direct asked them to."  and that's about
it, really.  LD initiated these meetings, and it's their call how to do
them.  But even aside from that, how many people here wouldn't leap at the
chance, if asked by LD: "We'd like to get your input and opinion on
(whatever), but you'll have to sign an NDA because we don't want the
information public yet"?  I know I sure as heck would.

I don't think it's an ego-tripping "I know something you don't know"
thing(1), more of an "I've got a chance to meet & influence the people who
make decisions".  It's this second thing that you need to weigh against 'the
desire to be able to speak freely', which is a very different balance than
what you infer above.

Like I said above, I think being able to talk to & (possibly) influence the
decision makers would be worth agreeing to LD's release schedule of
information.  I think most people here would feel the same.

This makes a lot of sense.  I gotta get caught up on work (school) and
sleep....then I'll probably dive into this and field a few more concerns people
have.  I'm also struggling to get my email through SpamCop with some changes of
theirs, but I'm definitely awaiting email from LEGO Direct on some things.

-Tim



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Let's be realistc (WasRe:MoreVenomAnyone? (WasRe:Givethemabreak (was:Hey,like,isanyonethere?)))
 
(...) Well, I'm not someone under an NDA, nor have I played on on TV, but... The simple answer is "Because LEGO Direct asked them to." and that's about it, really. LD initiated these meetings, and it's their call how to do them. But even aside from (...) (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general)

31 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR