Subject:
|
Re: Custom Built LEGO Sets in 2002
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:35:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1605 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Eric Joslin writes:
>
> > I have to admit, my LEGO CAD experience is limited to a single program. I
> > picked what appeared to be the most popular and best supported, and dove in.
>
> Which one? If you say "LDraw"
Yes, LDraw.
> I swear I am gonna give Tim Courtney 100
> lashes with a wet noodle next time I see him.
Kinky!
> www.ldraw.org puts WAY too
> much emphasis on ldraw itself which is arcane, hard to use, and well,
> antiquated. Oh, and did I mention hard to use?
Yeah, that's what I said. Must be how you guessed "LDraw".
> Seriously I don't know that any sort of market survey has been taken but I
> think MLCad has a lot of adherents. It's pretty well supported by the
> author. Feature rich, graphical, easy to use (except for the helps which are
> broken, unfortunately) and fast.
Hmm. Maybe I'll have to try and set it up at some point.
> > If it ever came down to it, I would probably go Gianluca Morelli's
> > route first.
>
> What was that, I think I missed it?
Someone in another response showed you an example of MorelliCAD, and I
personally am starting to think it's the best system.
eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Custom Built LEGO Sets in 2002
|
| (...) I'll be sure to tell Ann Landers you thought one of her pet phrases was "kinky"... :-) (...) Well, the undo is kind of weak, but it's pretty user friendly. :-) ++Lar (26 years ago, 8-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
