To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 2385
2384  |  2386
Subject: 
Once again, please move this discussion to lugnet.admin.general (was: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars
Followup-To: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:31:39 GMT
Viewed: 
138 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) writes:

> > This is a Call For Votes (CFV)
> > 
> > After much discussion it has been decided that an open public vote needs to
> > be made about this situation.  The vote is at the end of this message.
> > Please read the Problem Summary and Defense before voting.
> > [...]
> 
> The above message should have been posted with the 'Followup-To' header set
> to a lugnet.admin.general.  (But don't get mad at Adam; he made an honest
> mistake.)
> 
> Please do *not* reply to messages on this thread without changing the
> newsgroup header to lugnet.admin.general if it's not already set to that.
> 
> In other words, if you post a reply, please do not clog the other groups
> (especially .starwars) with more discussion of this -- it's too off-topic
> for any group except .admin.general -- thanks...

Once again, please do ***NOT*** reply to any message on this thread without
making sure that you are posting a reply to lugnet.admin.general *ONLY*.

It was an *accident* when Adam posted the original CFV message that the
Followup-To field was not set to lugnet.admin.general -- the discussion
should not be spread across 4 different groups.

Please do *NOT* continue to clog the other groups (especially .starwars)
with more discussion of this -- it's too off-topic for any group except
admin.general.

Thanks!

--Todd



Message is in Reply To:
  Please move this discussion to lugnet.admin.general (was: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET)
 
(...) Oops! Adam, the 'Followup-To' header needs to be part of the message header, not the body of the message. (...) The above message should have been posted with the 'Followup-To' header set to a lugnet.admin.general. (But don't get mad at Adam; (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)

101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR