 | | Re: The future of LDraw? —Sergio Reano
|
| | | (...) Yes, I agree! New generations looks at what I call 'vapor-ware'! The look is the most important think they watch. When I recreate my website, changing the look but not the contents, I got a 10-20% increased access. On the other side, the (...) (15 years ago, 23-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The future of LDraw? —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | | (...) Have you ever tried it ??????? Philo (15 years ago, 23-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The future of LDraw? —Anders Isaksson
|
| | | | (...) No, this is definitely not true. LeoCAD is AFAIK at least as powerful as MLCad. BlockCAD is the most limited of the pack, but also the easiest to use. When I google for "lego cad" I get: LDraw LeoCAD techbricks' link page containing links to (...) (15 years ago, 23-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The future of LDraw? —Remi Gagne
|
| | | | (...) I had no idea LeoCAD was that feature-rich. Looking closer, I see LeoCAD is hosted on google code, which implies it's an open source project. But I can't find any code anywhere... is LeoCAD open-source? Remi (15 years ago, 23-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The future of LDraw? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) Linked from leocad.org: (URL) (15 years ago, 24-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
