Subject:
|
Re: The future of LDraw?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:22:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
30593 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> Maybe LUGNET is best suited for LDraw and complexed cad.dev discussions? Maybe
> it has been a bad thing mainly for the vitality of LDraw that LUGNET has been
> deserted? Not LDraw usage, because I have already seen enough evidence that this
> apsect of LDraw is very much alive and new users are attracted. I could live
> with these tech discussions being moved to LDraw.org. But that demands someone
> migrates the whole forum over there. Preferably with an archive of all CAD
> discussion made on LUGNET. (What a job!) If not for any other reason, so for the
> sake of LDraw, LUGNET News must be saved (and hopefully vitalized!) until we
> have some other "hub" where we can discuss LCad tech stuff.
>
> /Tore
I'd see LDraw getting a forum system with most aspects of the bulletin board
system like user accounts instead of emails *but* having a threaded layout like
here on LUGNET.
I myself do not know anybody who uses LDraw or even LEGO for that matter. But
that might have something to do with my age rather than the other people. :)
-Santeri
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) I am very tempted to change the subject line of this branch of the discussion tree into "The future of LUGNET?". I know, it was mostly my "fault" the this thread changed subjects. But to me, it's the strength of the tree structure. Then anyone (...) (17 years ago, 16-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
