 | | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
(...) As fas as I understand young people, it might have something to do with a high proportion of text matched with a low proportion of visuals. It seems that new generations prefer it to be very much the other way round. I've looked at some sites (...) (15 years ago, 15-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
(...) LDRAW MUST NOT DIE Ldraw user since 1999 (15 years ago, 15-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
(...) Hm, not really. But I see definitely the potential in doing it. Once I start dismantling my old models (which, given the place and budget issues, is only a matter of time), I will probably do this as well. (...) Yes to all of the above! The (...) (15 years ago, 15-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
My turn to respond: IMHO LDraw is certainly not dead. In fact here in the Netherlands it’s is alive and kicking. With me presenting it to the public at LEGOWORLD in Zwolle every October I think there are many users who have joined since 2002 when I (...) (15 years ago, 15-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
(...) Out of the thirty odd responses I've got so far to my questions on TBB there hasn't been one mentioning ease of discussion so I'll hazard a guess that it's not a big deal. Tim (15 years ago, 15-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
(...) I'm with you on this Tore. I sure I've said this before but I despise the flat posting style of forums like phpBB and I like threaded discussions. Threads allow the conversation to wander to 2 or more different but related discussions while (...) (15 years ago, 15-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
(...) 1) Have you ever heard of LDraw? And if you have do you know what it is? Have you ever considered using it but decided against it? If so why? Did you know the parts are all designed by volunteers? Yes, I have heard of L-Draw and use it quite a (...) (15 years ago, 15-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
(...) (URL) This article> gives some answers to this question. (...) I think there are still as much activity on the subject as before. The activity is simply divided but spread. For instance, I'm amazed about the recent work by Sergio Reano (SR3D) (...) (15 years ago, 14-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
LDraw/LCad etc. are not nearly as dead as you think they are! The pioneering days are long gone, and the package of tools has entered the world of "mainstream software". People simply trust everything to work, and will only make themselves known (...) (15 years ago, 14-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
--snip-- (...) I felt you were preaching to the choir here so decided to broaden the questions and broaden the audience. Hopefully this will give us a bit of an idea of how the broader community deals with LDraw. (URL) (15 years ago, 14-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
--snip-- (...) --snip-- (...) Honestly I don't think LDD is so much of a competitor for many people. Its limited parts pallette keeps it quite restrictive. LDraw will always be the high end tool for LEGO CAD due to its versatility and when people (...) (15 years ago, 14-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
(...) Times changes and also the behaviour of the people. The internet changes much quicker. But I think the most important item is that LUTNET and also LDraw.org does not make adverticements. So how should be people find us. The new possibilities (...) (15 years ago, 14-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
|
(...) There are plenty of people still using LDraw and plenty of newcomers to it.In some ways I think it's a victim of its own success. The software is well developed and easy to use and the parts library is vast and easy to install. As such people (...) (15 years ago, 14-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | The future of LDraw?
|
|
There is a discussion in the Lugnet group at facebook on the fact that people leave Lugnet.com in favour for other, often theme specialized sites. Questions like "Why is it so and what can be done to get people back to Lugnet?" are discussed. Some (...) (15 years ago, 14-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: SR 3D Builder 0.4.5.8
|
|
(...) I think you just catched a really wrong version of that part. The file that is currently on the PT is fine like I already wrote above. The last change to this file has been on 07.03.2010 so the mentioned error is now gone. cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 10-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: SR 3D Builder 0.4.5.8
|
|
(...) The error is on the last comment line starting with 0. It's line 13 Note that it is on the unofficial file. Byes Sergio (15 years ago, 9-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: SR 3D Builder 0.4.5.8
|
|
(...) I just downloaded 32016.dat from the PT. I only found that this file is not terminated by CRLF like it should but all other lines seems to be ok. Can you please give the linenumber that has this fault? cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 9-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | SR 3D Builder 0.4.5.8 released
|
|
Hi again, as promised, it is available the latest release of my application It is available as usual for free from its official web site (URL) miss to read the history for a summary of enhancements and changes Sergio (15 years ago, 9-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | SR 3D Builder 0.4.5.8
|
|
Hi, for anyone interested in, a new video announcing the new features of the imminent release has been uploaded on youtube at the follwing address: (URL) new release will be available soon. One note about unofficial part library before leaving: part (...) (15 years ago, 9-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Axle Connectors - naming rationalisation
|
|
(...) It makes sense, and has the benefit of homogeneous naming with cross blocks. Philo (15 years ago, 4-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
