 | | Re: Part naming for technic liftarms vs. beams
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Hi Chris, Thanks for the news. I should not be surprised that you are on top of this. I understand the drawing the line in the sand. 2009-02 sounds great. Thanks, Kevin (16 years ago, 19-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Part naming for technic liftarms vs. beams
|
|
(...) Many of the Technic "beams" got re-cycled through the Parts Tracker in 2009-01 for primitive optimisation and BFC reasons. I took the opportunity to implement something that we had been talking about for some time - to name these types of (...) (16 years ago, 19-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Part naming for technic liftarms vs. beams
|
|
Hi gang, I want to start by saying thanks to all those involved in creating parts and managing the parts library. We toolsmiths would not have a job if it were'nt for the LDraw parts library. I have a question about naming conventions with respect (...) (16 years ago, 19-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Part naming and hard colored parts
|
|
(...) Sergio From the complete library update that was 2008-01, the !LDRAW_ORG line (line 4 of every file) should tell you what you need to know. Full details are in the header specification at (URL) Generic colour parts have an identifier of "Part" (...) (16 years ago, 19-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Part naming and hard colored parts
|
|
Hi everybody, as many of you already know, I'm the programmer of SR 3D Builder. Using the lDraw prebuild library has been for me the starting point for developing my application, but as things become complex I have to assume some convention in my (...) (16 years ago, 19-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
