 | | Part naming for technic liftarms vs. beams
|
|
Hi gang, I want to start by saying thanks to all those involved in creating parts and managing the parts library. We toolsmiths would not have a job if it were'nt for the LDraw parts library. I have a question about naming conventions with respect (...) (16 years ago, 19-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Part naming for technic liftarms vs. beams
|
|
(...) Many of the Technic "beams" got re-cycled through the Parts Tracker in 2009-01 for primitive optimisation and BFC reasons. I took the opportunity to implement something that we had been talking about for some time - to name these types of (...) (16 years ago, 19-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Part naming for technic liftarms vs. beams
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Hi Chris, Thanks for the news. I should not be surprised that you are on top of this. I understand the drawing the line in the sand. 2009-02 sounds great. Thanks, Kevin (16 years ago, 19-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
