Subject:
|
Re: wood4.dat, an example of LDLite syntax
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sat, 27 Mar 1999 23:25:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
751 times
|
| |
|
|
Looks like LUGNET does not like this file, since the Type-1 lines
have all been removed. You'll have to save the file from a
newsreader and then open it. My guess is the Type-1 lines do not pass
the test for .dat syntax and are thought to be garbage lines.
All the Type-0 comment lines get sent to LDLite just fine.
Since this file demonstrates the LDLite syntax,
only the first line of this file is in pure .dat syntax. (I
had to insert it to allow me to post the file).
Should we change the lugnet.cad.dat group to allow LDLite syntax,
or keep it to be "pure" .dat syntax. This only matters if you use
the LDLite extensions to refer to colors by name, but I guess it
would also affect things like LDS scripts.
-gyug
Paul Gyugyi wrote:
>
> 1 16 0 0 0 0.001 0 0 0 0.001 0 0 0 0.001 3001.dat
> 0 The preivous line was inserted to make LUGNET accept this post.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: wood4.dat, an example of LDLite syntax
|
| (...) Heh heh -- Well! -- Paul, they *weren't* Type-1 lines! From the LDraw FAQ: Part command. Inserts a part defined in another .DAT file. Line format: 1 colour x y z a b c d e f g h i part.dat where colour is a colour code: 0-15, 16, 24, 32-47, (...) (26 years ago, 28-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
