 | | Re: Tyre (tire) nomenclature —Steve Bliss
| | | | (...) I think standardization is a great idea. I'd like to see this discussion reach other "keepers of lego part names", at least for feedback. I don't expect that a consensus would be reached. For the units, I think millimeters would be better than (...) (19 years ago, 30-Apr-06, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Tyre (tire) nomenclature —Thomas Garrison
| | | | | (...) (ahem) That might work better with crossposting to, say, lugnet.parts or lugnet.cad.dat.parts, instead of hiding the discussion in .cad. . . (...) To clarify: that includes "local" units, i.e., stud and brick height measurements are relative (...) (19 years ago, 30-Apr-06, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.parts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Tyre (tire) nomenclature —Chris Dee
| | | | | | (...) Point taken - thanks. (...) The curious case of 33029 was discussed here (URL) with a good argument to stick with "system scale" for Scala parts. (...) Chris (19 years ago, 30-Apr-06, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.parts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Tyre (tire) nomenclature —Ross Crawford
| | | | | (...) Also lugnet.db.brictionary ;) (...) I support the idea of standardised names for tyres - I would probably vote for millimetres, as that would match better with the most of the ones molded by TLC. And I would further suggest that wheel (...) (19 years ago, 30-Apr-06, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary, FTX)
| | | | | | |
