 | | Re: Questions about LPub —Jaco van der Molen
|
| | | (...) I think I did this, but the picture I get is this: (URL) parts at all for the hinge? With the code like this: 0 STEP 1 1 -30 -16 70 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 4085C.DAT 1 1 30 -16 70 0 0 -1 0 1 0 1 0 0 4085C.DAT 1 1 0 -16 -110 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 (...) (19 years ago, 29-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Questions about LPub —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) I rewrote all the layout parsing so that it checks syntax and reports errors yesterday. I've wanted to eliminate the silent parse errors. I've got to debug this before I can release. Kevin (19 years ago, 31-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Questions about LPub —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) Jaco, I've backed out my efforts for metacommand syntax checking, and fixed this problem. I'm trying a second approach. In the meantime, LPub 2.3.0.10 is available with this fix for PLIs. Kevin (...) (19 years ago, 2-Jun-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Questions about LPub —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | Hello Kevin, (...) Thanks, this time I got the updated documentation! I tried the command "0 LPUB STEP_NUMBER PLACEMENT BOTTOM_RIGHT ASSEM INSIDE", though it works fine for single step layouts, it is still ineffective when there are several steps (...) (19 years ago, 2-Jun-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
