Subject:
|
Some comments on LPub - rotations
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sat, 26 Mar 2005 22:14:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
977 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Andreas Maier wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > > 7. I seem to be unable to use MLCAD rotation steps in a way that results in the
> > > rendered images being rotated as I see it in MLCAD. I have the impression that
> > > additive rotation steps are not supported by LPub (let me know if it should
> > > work, then I investigate more). Also, when using relative rotation steps, the
> > > rotation I see in MLCAD is different than the rendered images rotate. I have
> > > attached Comment7.zip containing some files which show this effect. I'm not sure
> > > to what extent any MLCAD settings influence this behaviour, so I included the
> > > MLCAD.INI and the settings from the Registry in the zip, as well as a screen
> > > shot of how I see it in MLCAD. The different rotation can be seen when comparing
> > > the MLCAD screenshot (MLCAD-Screenshot-AfterRotation.png) with the image of the
> > > fourth step (Comment7_0_03.bmp). While you may argue that the MLCAD viewing
> > > angle is simply different, my point is that the direction of the x,y,z axis are
> > > confusing between MLCAD and LPub. The perspective on the model is the same
> > > before the rotation step (comparing MLCAD-Screenshot-BeforeRotation.png with
> > > Comment7_0_01.bmp), and is different afterwards. This is a strong indication
> > > that the axis are understood differently by the two programs. I did not dig into
> > > whether LPub, L3P, POVRay or even MLCAD is the cuplrit. Any insight on what I
> > > can do to get that consistent, is appreciated much.
> >
> > Just this weekend I fixed this problem. Things seemed to work OK for rotations
> > about the Y axis, but not much else. I reread the MLCad Spezification, and have
> > fixed my bug. It has been there a long time, and reported in the past, but I
> > failed to fix it then.
>
> I verified it and it works great.
I have to correct myself. It does not seem to work, but then as I re-read your
answer, it seems that the fixed version is still in the pipe and not yet in
2.2.0.9 beta, true ?
Thanks
Andy
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Some comments on LPub [DAT]
|
| (...) :-) Thanks for the flowers ... (...) correctly. (...) I believe this is sufficient, since the window is scrollable. I did not yet see a case where the top of the contents had fallen off the scrollable contents. In addition, it would be nice if (...) (19 years ago, 26-Mar-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
