 | | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source? —Tore Eriksson
| | | | (...) That is closest. (...) I am not familiar to the exact meaning of open source, but I guess it can be a little like when you submit the dat code for a part to the PT. Suddenly you find that it has been changed or even renamed. In almost all (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source? —Tim Courtney
| | | | | | (...) I understand the feeling. For me, when I open up my work (I don't code, but I do write, papers, a book, proposals, etc) to others, I expect and welcome criticism, so long as it is framed constructively. If I were to venture a guess, you aren't (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | | | submission policy at the PT (Was: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?) —Willy Tschager
| | | | | (...) [SNIP] (...) even if you re-think that policy it'll happen anyway. almost a year ago some guidelines have been posted (URL) about re-submitting fixes of new parts (new parts not updated ones) but unless the PT doesn't restrict the (...) (21 years ago, 16-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | |
