 | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote ... (...) Is this a joke? You argue very well in "Inversion" in "Language Extension Functionality" about the 3D tube ;-) /Lars Sorry if I missed a pun. (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts.lst and mklst(?).exe.
|
|
Johannes Keukelaar wrote... (...) It does work, you can open either 1234a.dat or 1234A.DAT, or even 1234a.DaT. The fat/vfat/msdos filesystem in Linux is case-insensitive. Try it! (...) Pure MSDOS programs see all files in uppercase. /Lars (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts.lst and mklst(?).exe.
|
|
(...) I believe that straight-DOS programs don't have mixed-case filename information. A pure DOS hard-drive actually stores all filenames on the harddrive in upper case, and MSDOS under Windows maintains upper-case-only for compatibility with older (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: General Comments to MLCad
|
|
(...) Yep. LDLite does things like 0 COLOR <color definition information> along with other stuff, and the HTML instruction generator in LDAO recognizes a subassembly statement: 0 SUB <file> <layout options> and in lugnet.cad.dev, we're proposing to (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
(...) In that case, why are we wiggling about with this BFC extension stuff? Rendering programs can figure out what order vertices should be put in, and they can figure out which way a polygon is facing. They don't need all this extra effort from us (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
