 | | Re: New part: Plate 6 x 6 x 2/3 Cross with Dome - 30303.dat
|
|
(...) Nice job, it looks good. While looking at the new tubes, I noticed another problem. There are no edges on the curved surfaces! You can see this if you look at the part in LDLite with wireframe and rotation turned on. The regular studs, and the (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: track, 9 volt. mockup, measurement request of this part
|
|
Hello all, I've noticed there is a mockup file being passed around, wich proofs there is a definite need for an official part #2865 - Train Track 9V Straight. Hmm.. it's a nice difficult one. Would you please answer the following questions: 1. Has (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: help - part number wanted
|
|
(...) My Guess is that he is refering to the little grey part that goes over the axle joiner piece. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
(...) at first i misread that as: (...) and thought to myself "wow, Steve's in a really cynical mood".. hehe.. guess i'm just projecting my own cynicism... J (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: help - part number wanted
|
|
Axel Poqué wrote in message ... (...) Shuttle". (...) I believe that the part you are looking at is part number 6631. In my inventory I describe it as: 6631 - Plate, 2x6, with 1x2 "T" Hole in Center and One Deceding 1/2 Two of these plates are used (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: New part: Plate 6 x 6 x 2/3 Cross with Dome - 30303.dat [DAT]
|
|
(...) OK Steve, I have tried to fix the two tubes on the bottom of this part please look it over and give me some comments. Anyone elses comments are welcome too. Thanks, Paul 0 Plate 6 x 6 x 2/3 Cross with Dome 0 Name: 30303.dat 0 Author: Paul (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Hovertank (repost) [DAT]
|
|
Here is a model I posted some time ago and didn't work. Hope it does this time and if it doesn't sorry. Mladen Pejic, over an out! 1 0 -100 -8 40 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3033.DAT 1 0 20 -8 90 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3023.DAT 1 0 20 -8 -10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
Steve: (...) I kind of like the newer approach. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Partsref is Moving to LUGNET
|
|
I haven't gotten any nibbles, can someone suggest a group better suited to answering this question? (...) <for one part> (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Partsref is Moving to LUGNET
|
|
(...) This is kludgy but might work. Details left as an exercise. Your problem is that what you want is to know when a file is *new to YOU* not what it's timestamp is. Keep two complete sets of .dat files. One is an image of the state of files, but (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Partsref is Moving to LUGNET
|
|
(...) You could try the version which comes with Cynwin32: (URL) used Beta 20.1; it seems pretty stable. If you're not too keen on using the Unix sub-layer (slow), try dmake: (URL) it seems to have gone commercial -- you have to *pay* for the (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Partsref is Moving to LUGNET
|
|
(...) Yep, I'm familiar with make. I even went to look for one once. Do you know how hard it is to search the net for 'make'? I never could figure out a decent set of search-words... Oh, wait. I've got a make.exe with my old copy of Turbo Pascal. (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Partsref is Moving to LUGNET
|
|
(...) Are you familiar with the make utility? It allows you to describe an arbitrary set of modules, with their associated interdependencies, and then re-build only the modules which have changed and modules dependant upon them. Of course, using (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
Still discussing: (URL) and now (URL) I posted an update to the v4 spec just now. It includes the changes suggested by Jacob. Things have been quiet lately, so I want to throw out a couple of questions: Does anyone have an opinion on whether it (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | help - where's swengine.dat
|
|
I've found a few DAT files on lugnet.cad.dat.models that reference part swengine.dat. Yet I can't find this part. Who can tell me where this part is? Anyone... anyone... anyone... James Wilson (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Partsref is Moving to LUGNET
|
|
(...) That's fine with me. The only downside is applying updates. When new parts are released for LDraw, I don't update individual partsref images and pages, I just regenerate the whole shebang. So any manual edits would probably get overwritten. (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: part # request.
|
|
(...) Make mock-ups from whatever you want. Just *please*, don't try to make submit-able models from one picture. Or several pictures. Steve (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Off topic question Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
|
Nephilim <jthompson@esker.com> wrote in message news:FLv94v.I82@lugnet.com... (...) I've done the same in the past. As I see it, the thoughts of the community can be broken down in the following ways: (1) The purists hate the idea of any non-LEGO (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part # request.
|
|
(...) I got flamed for making parts and even mock-ups without the part in hand... -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: part # request.
|
|
Wait, are you modeling a part without having the part in hand? Is that wise? Just curious. (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
