 | | Re: New part: Plate 6 x 6 x 2/3 Cross with Dome - 30303.dat
|
|
(...) Nice job, it looks good. While looking at the new tubes, I noticed another problem. There are no edges on the curved surfaces! You can see this if you look at the part in LDLite with wireframe and rotation turned on. The regular studs, and the (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: track, 9 volt. mockup, measurement request of this part
|
|
Hello all, I've noticed there is a mockup file being passed around, wich proofs there is a definite need for an official part #2865 - Train Track 9V Straight. Hmm.. it's a nice difficult one. Would you please answer the following questions: 1. Has (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: help - part number wanted
|
|
(...) My Guess is that he is refering to the little grey part that goes over the axle joiner piece. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
(...) at first i misread that as: (...) and thought to myself "wow, Steve's in a really cynical mood".. hehe.. guess i'm just projecting my own cynicism... J (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: help - part number wanted
|
|
Axel Poqué wrote in message ... (...) Shuttle". (...) I believe that the part you are looking at is part number 6631. In my inventory I describe it as: 6631 - Plate, 2x6, with 1x2 "T" Hole in Center and One Deceding 1/2 Two of these plates are used (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: New part: Plate 6 x 6 x 2/3 Cross with Dome - 30303.dat [DAT]
|
|
(...) OK Steve, I have tried to fix the two tubes on the bottom of this part please look it over and give me some comments. Anyone elses comments are welcome too. Thanks, Paul 0 Plate 6 x 6 x 2/3 Cross with Dome 0 Name: 30303.dat 0 Author: Paul (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Hovertank (repost) [DAT]
|
|
Here is a model I posted some time ago and didn't work. Hope it does this time and if it doesn't sorry. Mladen Pejic, over an out! 1 0 -100 -8 40 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3033.DAT 1 0 20 -8 90 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3023.DAT 1 0 20 -8 -10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
Steve: (...) I kind of like the newer approach. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Partsref is Moving to LUGNET
|
|
I haven't gotten any nibbles, can someone suggest a group better suited to answering this question? (...) <for one part> (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Partsref is Moving to LUGNET
|
|
(...) This is kludgy but might work. Details left as an exercise. Your problem is that what you want is to know when a file is *new to YOU* not what it's timestamp is. Keep two complete sets of .dat files. One is an image of the state of files, but (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
