 | | Re: Datsville Link
|
|
(...) OK. (15 years ago, 13-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Datsville Link
|
|
(...) Meanwhile, we could replace that dead link with some note saying "Waiting for a new site" or something like that. /Tore (15 years ago, 12-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Log Cabin! (Was: GallaghersArt.com Forums now open)
|
|
(...) Datsville! /Tore (15 years ago, 12-Jan-10, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | GallaghersArt.com Forums now open
|
|
I just made my own forums live over the weekend. The main purpose at this time is to allow me to release some of the LDraw files that go with some of my MOC’s, enable more info to be posted without creating more pages and bogging down my main site, (...) (15 years ago, 12-Jan-10, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Simple LDraw viewer code for Processing.org
|
|
(...) That is the key question. I have not tried a larger model yet (it takes some preparation first to inline the model). I think I first may try to address the question of how to efficiently enable part library access for the embedded viewer. (...) (15 years ago, 12-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Simple LDraw viewer code for Processing.org
|
|
(...) Incidentally, Processing does have an OpenGL renderer (JOGL), although I haven't done any sort of testing to see how significant the performance benefit is. I used the software renderer for the web viewer I posted just because the support (...) (15 years ago, 12-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Simple LDraw viewer code for Processing.org
|
|
(...) I tried to write a viewer once too (as a series of experimentation of maybe having done a CAD program for parts authors!) using Tcl and OpenGL, but it turned out to be *REALLY* slow, most probably due to bad subfile handling. While the Animal (...) (15 years ago, 12-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: SR 3D Builder 0.4.5.7 RELEASED
|
|
(...) Please let me know your graphic adapter model and I'll let you know if it can work... better via email since this can bore other users... (...) Please note that ONLY SOME ATI card have problems. So long I get errors with ATI 1300, 1400 and (...) (15 years ago, 12-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Simple LDraw viewer code for Processing.org
|
|
(...) Here it looks very promising. But what will be the loading time if I have larger models? I would be very interested in this kind of app as it will make things much more easy to display models to the webside visitor (see my "personal OMR" at (...) (15 years ago, 12-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Simple LDraw viewer code for Processing.org
|
|
(...) That looks very good. I have also made an attempt to build a viewer, but it is also very limited in what it can do (very little files if you do not wait an hour, no optional lines, but it could read subfiles). As I discovered that it is quite (...) (15 years ago, 12-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Extractor/Manipulator?
|
|
(...) Here is what I have found out about that META commands: 0 ROTATION CENTER 0 0 0 1 "Custom1" 0 ROTATION CENTER 2 3 4 1 "New Custom" The first three numbers are the xyz values of the rotation point The fourth number indicates the "Allow (...) (15 years ago, 12-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Simple LDraw viewer code for Processing.org
|
|
(...) The neat thing about Processing is that since it is based on Java it is possible to export Processing programs (excluding some functions) as cross-platform applets that can be embedded in web pages. So, what Andy has created is the basis for (...) (15 years ago, 12-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Extractor/Manipulator?
|
|
(...) Me too. I would prefer if we could set a standard within existing META-command sets, but I doubt that it may meet our requirements. Btw, what are our requirements? What do we want achieve? I could think of: 1. Standard tags that indicate... (...) (15 years ago, 12-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDDP version 2.1 beta test
|
|
(...) Oops, sorry. I only use the dev vesion of LDDP and neglected to consider this. I'll prevent it from happening in future updates. -Orion (15 years ago, 12-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Extractor/Manipulator?
|
|
(...) I support extending the language. Maybe not in the above form but in some form. I'd also love to see something like the MLCad.ini minifig entries standardized. It doesn't have to be officially supported, a de facto standard is still a (...) (15 years ago, 12-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Simple LDraw viewer code for Processing.org
|
|
Well, in the interests of sharing, as this community does so well, here's the basics of a simple LDraw viewer that I wrote in the Processing language about a year and a half ago. It is by no means complete, but it will display small models (if you (...) (15 years ago, 12-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: SR 3D Builder 0.4.5.7 RELEASED
|
|
(...) Thank you! Looking forward to your next release... :-) -Andy (15 years ago, 12-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Extractor/Manipulator?
|
|
(...) So how about this time we do something universal? We've talked this up before at least once: (URL) wants to step forward and propose some generic META commands to at least identify a group of parts that belong to a single minifig? Can we adapt (...) (15 years ago, 11-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Extractor/Manipulator?
|
|
(...) Of course the problem with this approach is that you have to learn Yet Another ApplicationTM to do what you want. (15 years ago, 11-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig manipulator?
|
|
(...) All I can say is WOW! (15 years ago, 11-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
